North Dakota — school discipline
- The lines the state draws
- On suspension: "A school district may suspend a student for up to ten days for insubordination, habitual indolence, disorderly conduct, or for violating a school district weapons policy." A twenty-day line applies to a student "who is enrolled in an alternative education program for which state per student payments are available". (N.D.C.C. § 15.1-19-09(2), (3)) On expulsion: "A school district may expel a student, including one enrolled in an alternative education program, for up to twelve months for insubordination, habitual indolence, or disorderly conduct. The school district shall consider the severity of the infraction, the age of the student, and the disciplinary history of the student to determine the duration of the expulsion." (N.D.C.C. § 15.1-19-09(4)) On firearms the weapons section sets a floor: the district's policy must "Require a student who possesses a firearm in violation of this section to be expelled for at least one year", while authorizing the superintendent or principal "to modify an expulsion for firearms possession under this section on a case-by-case basis in accordance with criteria established by the board." (N.D.C.C. § 15.1-19-10(2)(b), (c)) The statute states no separate emergency-removal route.
- Offices and appeal bodies in these sources
- The decision-makers named are all local. Expulsion runs through "a school board or its designated hearing officer", and the review route is stated in one sentence: "If a designated hearing officer orders that a student be expelled, the student may seek a review of the decision by the school board, based on the record of the expulsion hearing." (N.D.C.C. § 15.1-19-10(2)(c)) Participation is stated: "A student's parent or representative must be allowed to participate in the expulsion hearing." (N.D.C.C. § 15.1-19-09(1)) No appeal beyond the school board, and no role for the superintendent of public instruction or any other state office, appears in these sections.
No state office address, phone number, or email for parents appears in the sources; that absence is the finding. - Sources last checked
- Sep 1, 2026
Reproduced from the state's own statutes quoted below: potentially relevant official sources, not a determination of which one governs any situation.
This page assembles what North Dakota publishes in statute about K-12 school discipline. This is a baseline docket page: the governing sections, the lines the state draws, and the decision-makers and appeal route, quoted with dates. The full sections (the framework route by route, the four hoisted process rows, every stated timeline, the district delegation map, and records access) follow as the discipline layer deepens behind its breadth sprint; the change log states exactly what is not yet captured. North Dakota's statute is unusually thin at this layer and unusually explicit about why: the procedure a family will actually meet is the district's, written under a legislative instruction. "The rules for expulsion must provide for a procedural due process hearing under subsection 2 of section 15.1-19-10 before the determination to expel a student is made." (N.D.C.C. § 15.1-19-09(1)) That subsection supplies the one hearing clock in the chapter: "Before expelling a student, a school board or its designated hearing officer, within ten days of the student's suspension, shall provide the student with a hearing at which time the school board or its designated hearing officer shall take testimony and consider evidence, including the existence of mitigating circumstances." (N.D.C.C. § 15.1-19-10(2)(c)) On schooling during an expulsion the statute permits rather than requires: "If a school district expels a student under this section, the district may authorize the provision of educational services to the student in an alternative setting." (N.D.C.C. § 15.1-19-10(3)) The weapons section states its own relation to disability law — actions under it "may not conflict with state special education laws or with the Individuals With Disabilities Education Act". (N.D.C.C. § 15.1-19-10(4)) The conduct rules and the punishments attached to them are the board's to write: "The board of each school district shall adopt a policy governing the possession of weapons and firearms on school property or at a school function and provide for the punishment of any student found to be in violation of the policy." (N.D.C.C. § 15.1-19-10(1)) That delegation will anchor the full page's delegation map. For a student with an IEP or Section 504 plan, the disability layer lives on this site's North Dakota special education page. Confirm applicability with the district and the agencies. All dates on this page are quoted from the sources, not a deadline calculation performed for you.
Source map
| Document | Location | Dates |
|---|---|---|
| N.D.C.C. ch. 15.1-19 (Students and Safety), including §§ 15.1-19-09, 15.1-19-10 and 15.1-19-30 | ndlegis.gov | no edition date published in the document; session-law notations through S.L. 2025; retrieved Sep 1, 2026 |
| N.D. Admin. Code rules on suspension and expulsion, if any | not located in this review | capture pending |
| NDDPI guidance on student discipline | — | not located in this review; capture pending |
| District suspension and expulsion rules, and district weapons policies | each district, per N.D.C.C. §§ 15.1-19-09(1) and 15.1-19-10(1) | never captured; the full page's delegation map will point at them |
Change log
Sep 1, 2026 · Baseline page created (discipline-layer breadth sprint). Captured first-party under recipe tools/recipes/north-dakota-discipline.json: N.D.C.C. chapter 15.1-19 from the Legislative Branch's own chapter PDF, which plain curl reaches and which carries both discipline sections in one document. Findings recorded: (1) the state delegates the procedure itself — § 15.1-19-09(1) instructs each board to adopt the suspension and expulsion rules, and § 15.1-19-10(1) each board to adopt the weapons policy and the punishments under it, so a family's actual process is a district document this page does not carry; (2) the chapter states exactly one hearing deadline, the ten days in § 15.1-19-10(2)(c), and states no notice requirement, no informal conference, and no emergency-removal route at all; (3) the only review named is to the school board from a designated hearing officer, with no state-level appeal and no role for the superintendent of public instruction in these sections; (4) § 15.1-19-30(2)(c), on safety plans after a student sexual offense, directs that an expulsion hearing be held "within the time period prescribed under section 15.1-19-09" — but § 15.1-19-09 prescribes maximum suspension and expulsion durations rather than a hearing deadline, and the chapter's only hearing deadline sits in § 15.1-19-10. The cross-reference is recorded as the state writes it; this page does not resolve which period is meant; (5) no state office, address, phone number, or email for parents appears in the sources; that absence is the finding; (6) the chapter PDF publishes no edition date, so its date is carried as the session-law notations the sections themselves print. Not yet built, pending the deepening pass: sections 01–02 (framework, hoisted rows, timelines), the district delegation map, and records access. Internet Archive captures: to be added. Reviewer: Carrie Schluter, reviewed 2026-09-01. Corrections on the record in this log: hello@fieldassembly.net.