Minnesota — school discipline
- The lines the state draws
- Minnesota defines four removals, and defines them against each other. ""Dismissal" means the denial of the current educational program to any pupil, including exclusion, expulsion, and suspension. It does not include removal from class." ""Suspension" means an action by the school administration, under rules promulgated by the school board, prohibiting a pupil from attending school for a period of no more than ten school days. If a suspension is longer than five days, the suspending administrator must provide the superintendent with a reason for the longer suspension." ""Exclusion" means an action taken by the school board to prevent enrollment or reenrollment of a pupil for a period that shall not extend beyond the school year." ""Expulsion" means a school board action to prohibit an enrolled pupil from further attendance for up to 12 months from the date the pupil is expelled." (121A.41) Removal is stated as a last resort rather than a first option: "No school shall dismiss any pupil without attempting to use nonexclusionary disciplinary policies and practices before dismissal proceedings or pupil withdrawal agreements, except where it appears that the pupil will create an immediate and substantial danger to self or to surrounding persons or property." (121A.45(1))
- Offices and appeal bodies in these sources
- Suspension is the school administration's; exclusion and expulsion are the school board's, and neither may happen without a hearing. "No exclusion or expulsion shall be imposed without a hearing, unless the right to a hearing is waived in writing by the pupil and parent or guardian. The action shall be initiated by the school board or its agent." (121A.47(1)) The hearing runs on a stated clock: "The hearing shall be scheduled within ten days of the service of the written notice unless an extension, not to exceed five days, is requested for good cause by the school board, pupil, parent or guardian." It is the family's to open or close: "The hearing shall be closed unless the pupil, parent or guardian requests an open hearing." (121A.47(3), (5)) The written notice of intent to take action must "contain a complete statement of the facts, a list of the witnesses and a description of their testimony;", "state the date, time, and place of the hearing;", "be accompanied by a copy of sections 121A.40 to 121A.56;", and "describe the nonexclusionary disciplinary practices accorded the pupil in an attempt to avoid the expulsion proceedings;". (121A.47(2)) No state office, phone number, or email for parents appears in the sources; that absence is the finding, though the Department of Education is named as the publisher of a legal assistance resource list, quoted below.
- Sources last checked
- Aug 30, 2026
Reproduced from the state's own statutes quoted below: potentially relevant official sources, not a determination of which one governs any situation.
This page assembles what Minnesota publishes in statute about K-12 school discipline. This is a baseline docket page: the governing sections, the lines the state draws, and the decision-makers and hearing rights, quoted with dates. The full sections (the framework route by route, the four hoisted process rows, every stated timeline, the district delegation map, and records access) follow as the discipline layer deepens behind its breadth sprint; the change log states exactly what is not yet captured. Minnesota is one of a small number of states whose statute routes the family toward a lawyer by name. The expulsion notice must inform the pupil and parent of the right to "have a representative of the pupil's own choosing, including legal counsel, at the hearing. The district must advise the pupil's parent or guardian that free or low-cost legal assistance may be available and that a legal assistance resource list is available from the Department of Education and is posted on their website;", along with rights to "examine the pupil's records before the hearing;", to "present evidence; and" to "confront and cross-examine witnesses." (121A.47(2)) That resource list is a state-published document and is listed below as capture pending. Before a suspension the statute requires a conference and states what happens when the removal cannot wait: "The school administration shall not suspend a pupil from school without an informal administrative conference with the pupil. The informal administrative conference shall take place before the suspension, except where it appears that the pupil will create an immediate and substantial danger to self or to surrounding persons or property, in which case the conference shall take place as soon as practicable following the suspension." At that conference "a school administrator shall notify the pupil of the grounds for the suspension, provide an explanation of the evidence the authorities have, and the pupil may present the pupil's version of the facts." (121A.46(1), (2)) The written notice that follows carries its own contents and clocks, including a readmission plan and, again, a copy of the Act; it is served on the pupil "at or before the time the suspension is to take effect, and upon the pupil's parent or guardian by mail within 48 hours of the conference." (121A.46(3)) Schooling is protected at two thresholds: "Alternative education services must be provided to a pupil who is suspended for more than five consecutive school days.", and separately, "School administration must allow a suspended pupil the opportunity to complete all school work assigned during the period of the pupil's suspension and to receive full credit for satisfactorily completing the assignments." (121A.46(4), (5)) A tenth cumulative day of removal triggers a meeting: "If a pupil's total days of removal from school exceeds ten cumulative days in a school year, the school district shall make reasonable attempts to convene a meeting with the pupil and the pupil's parent or guardian before subsequently removing the pupil from school". (121A.45(3)) The conduct rules themselves are the board's — the first ground for dismissal is "willful violation of any reasonable school board regulation. Such regulation must be clear and definite to provide notice to pupils that they must conform their conduct to its requirements;". (121A.45(2)) That delegation will anchor the full page's delegation map. For a student with an IEP or Section 504 plan, the disability layer lives on this site's Minnesota special education page. Confirm applicability with the district and the agencies. All dates on this page are quoted from the sources, not a deadline calculation performed for you.
Source map
| Document | Location | Dates |
|---|---|---|
| Minn. Stat. 121A.41 (definitions) | revisor.mn.gov | recent-history list of amendments on the section page; no separate revision date; retrieved Aug 30, 2026 |
| Minn. Stat. 121A.45 (grounds for dismissal) | revisor.mn.gov | recent-history list of amendments on the section page; no separate revision date; retrieved Aug 30, 2026 |
| Minn. Stat. 121A.46 (suspension procedures) | revisor.mn.gov | recent-history list of amendments on the section page; no separate revision date; retrieved Aug 30, 2026 |
| Minn. Stat. 121A.47 (exclusion and expulsion procedures) | revisor.mn.gov | recent-history list of amendments on the section page; no separate revision date; retrieved Aug 30, 2026 |
| The Department of Education's legal assistance resource list | required by Minn. Stat. 121A.47(2) to be available from the department and posted on its website | not located in this review; capture pending |
| The remaining sections of the Pupil Fair Dismissal Act, Minn. Stat. 121A.40 – 121A.56 | cited throughout the captured sections | capture pending |
| School board regulations on pupil conduct | each board, per Minn. Stat. 121A.45(2)(a) | never captured; the full page's delegation map will point at them |
Change log
Aug 30, 2026 · Baseline page created (discipline-layer breadth sprint). Captured first-party under recipe tools/recipes/minnesota-discipline.json: Minn. Stat. 121A.41, 121A.45, 121A.46, and 121A.47, each from its own citation address at the Revisor of Statutes, scoped to the page's main element. Findings recorded: (1) Minnesota defines dismissal, suspension, exclusion, and expulsion against each other in one definitions section, with suspension capped at ten school days and expulsion at twelve months; (2) a suspension longer than five days obliges the suspending administrator to give the superintendent a reason, which is an internal accountability step no other state captured so far states in statute; (3) nonexclusionary practices must be attempted before any dismissal proceeding, and the expulsion notice must describe which ones were tried — the statute requires the district to show its work; (4) the notice must tell the family that free or low-cost legal assistance may be available and that a legal assistance resource list is available from the Department of Education and posted on its website; that list is a state-published document and is listed as capture pending; (5) alternative education services are required past five consecutive suspension days, and a suspended pupil must be allowed to complete assigned work for full credit; (6) exceeding ten cumulative days of removal in a school year triggers a required attempt to convene a meeting with the family before any further removal, with an optional mental health screening the district need not pay for; (7) the first ground for dismissal is willful violation of a school board regulation that "must be clear and definite to provide notice to pupils" — a delegation with a stated quality standard attached, and the entry that will anchor the full page's delegation map; (8) no state office or parent contact appears in the sources. Not yet built, pending the deepening pass: sections 01–02 (framework, hoisted rows, timelines), the district delegation map, and records access. Internet Archive captures: to be added. Reviewer: Carrie Schluter, reviewed 2026-08-30. Corrections on the record in this log: hello@fieldassembly.net.