Colorado — school discipline
- The lines the state draws
- The statute stacks its removal powers. A board may "Delegate to any school principal within the school district or to a person designated in writing by the principal the power to suspend a pupil in his school for not more than five school days on the grounds stated in section 22-33-106 (1)(a), (1)(b), (1)(c), or (1)(e) or not more than ten school days on the grounds stated in section 22-33-106 (1)(d);" and may "Suspend, on the grounds stated in section 22-33-106, a pupil from school for not more than another ten school days, or may delegate such power to its executive officer; except that the latter may extend a suspension to an additional ten school days if necessary in order to present the matter to the next meeting of the board of education, but the total period of suspension pursuant to this paragraph (b) and paragraph (a) of this subsection (2) shall not exceed twenty-five school days;". (22-33-105(2)(a), (2)(b)) Beyond that, a board may "Deny admission to, or expel for any period not extending beyond one year, any student whom the board of education, in accordance with the limitations imposed by this article 33, determines does not qualify for admission to, or continued attendance at, the public schools of the district." (22-33-105(2)(c)) The ten-day mark also divides the process owed: "A pupil suspended for a period of ten days or less shall receive an informal hearing by the school principal or the principal's designee prior to the pupil's removal from school, unless an emergency requires immediate removal from school, in which case an informal hearing shall follow as soon after the pupil's removal as practicable. Any pupil suspended for more than ten days shall be given the opportunity to request a review of the suspension before an appropriate official of the school district." (22-33-105(3)(c))
- Offices and appeal bodies in these sources
- Expulsion runs through a hearing officer and then the board. The district carries the burden: "the school district has the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that the student violated section 22-33-106 and the school district's policy." (22-33-105(2.3)(a)) The officer must be disinterested: "A hearing officer must not have a conflict of interest with regard to a student under consideration for expulsion or denial of admission, or toward any alleged victim." (22-33-105(2.4)(a)) The decision and the appeal are both timed: "An executive officer shall render a written opinion that imposes or refrains from imposing disciplinary action within five business days after an expulsion hearing is conducted by the executive officer or by a designee acting as a hearing officer." (22-33-105(2.3)(c)) A student expelled after that hearing "has ten business days after the decision of the executive officer is rendered to appeal the decision to the board of education, after which time the decision to grant or deny the appeal is at the discretion of the board of education." (22-33-105(2.3)(d)) If the board upholds the expulsion, "the student is entitled to a review of the decision of the board of education in accordance with section 22-33-108."
No state office, phone number, or email for parents appears in the sources; that absence is the finding. - Sources last checked
- Oct 20, 2026
Reproduced from the state's own statutes quoted below: potentially relevant official sources, not a determination of which one governs any situation.
This page assembles what Colorado publishes in statute about K-12 school discipline: who may suspend, expel, or deny admission and how, the notice and hearing the statute requires, what continues during a removal, where the appeal routes run — through the district's own hearing officer and board, and from there into court — and, because the statute assigns much of the conduct-code detail to each district, a map of the questions answered only in a district's own conduct and discipline code. The fullest single statement is Colorado Revised Statutes Title 22, Article 33 (sections 22-33-105 through 22-33-108), together with section 22-32-109.1's safe school plan requirement; the title's own head reads "Colorado Revised Statutes 2024" and every page footer reads "Uncertified Printout", the state's own caveat on the document it publishes. Colorado's own vocabulary appears throughout: the suspending authority, the executive officer, the hearing officer, denial of admission, the habitually disruptive student, and the conduct and discipline code inside each district's safe school plan. District conduct and discipline codes add procedural detail this page does not carry; the delegation map below points at exactly those questions. Confirm applicability with the district and the agencies. All dates on this page are quoted from the sources, not a deadline calculation performed for you.
The framework, as the state writes it
Suspension (22-33-105(2)(a)–(b), (3), (4)). The five/ten/twenty-five-school-day escalation and the delegation to a principal or executive officer are quoted in the docket. Before extending the suspension, the suspending authority shall "Make every reasonable effort to meet with the parent, guardian, or legal custodian of the pupil during the period of suspension" but shall "Not extend a period of suspension because of the failure of the suspending authority to meet with the parent, guardian, or legal custodian during the period of suspension" (22-33-105(3)(d)(I), (3)(d)(II)). As an alternative to suspending at all, "The board of education of each district shall establish, as an alternative to suspension, a policy that allows the pupil to remain in school by encouraging the parent, guardian, or legal custodian, with the consent of the pupil's teacher or teachers, to attend class with the pupil for a period of time specified by the suspending authority. If the parent, guardian, or legal custodian does not agree to attend class with the pupil or fails to attend class with the pupil, the pupil shall be suspended in accordance with the conduct and discipline code of the district." (22-33-105(4))
Expulsion and denial of admission (22-33-105(2)(c), (2.3), (2.4)). The one-year cap, the burden of proof, and the hearing officer's conflict-free requirement are quoted in the docket. The hearing officer is trained under a program the statute directs the state to build: "On or before June 30, 2024, the department of education shall create and maintain the online training program for hearing officers who conduct expulsion hearings." (22-33-105(2.4)(c)(I)) "Beginning January 1, 2025, school districts and the state charter school institute shall require hearing officers to complete an initial five-hour training program within thirty days after the date the hearing officer starts work as a hearing officer", plus "an annual training program to stay informed on school discipline updates." (22-33-105(2.4)(c)(II)(A), (c)(II)(B)) Before a school district may use a student's own statement as evidence toward a mandatory expulsion, "A public school employee shall not use a student's statement concerning an act alleged to have been committed by the student that results in mandatory expulsion pursuant to section 22-33-106 (1)(d), in the expulsion hearing, unless the statement is signed by the student and a parent, guardian, or legal or physical custodian is present when the student signs the statement or admission or a reasonable attempt was made to contact the parent, guardian, or legal or physical custodian to have the parent, guardian, or legal or physical custodian present when the student signed the statement." (22-33-106.3(1))
Grounds for suspension, expulsion, and denial of admission (22-33-106). Among the grounds a district may act on: "Continued willful disobedience or open and persistent defiance of proper authority;" (22-33-106(1)(a)) and a declaration that a student is a "habitually disruptive student", a term the statute defines: it "means a child who has caused a material and substantial disruption on school grounds, in a school vehicle, or at a school activity or sanctioned event three or more times during the course of a school year". (22-33-106(1)(c.5)(II)) Some grounds run to mandatory suspension or expulsion review: "Committing one of the following offenses on school grounds, in a school vehicle, or at a school activity or sanctioned event: (I) Possession of a dangerous weapon without the authorization of the school or the school district; (II) The use, possession, or sale of a drug or controlled substance as defined in section 18-18-102 (5), C.R.S.; or (III) The commission of an act that, if committed by an adult, would be robbery pursuant to part 3 of article 4 of title 18, C.R.S., or assault pursuant to part 2 of article 3 of title 18, C.R.S., other than the commission of an act that would be third degree assault under section 18-3-204, C.R.S., if committed by an adult." (22-33-106(1)(d)) Before acting on any ground, "Each school district shall consider each of the following factors before suspending or expelling a student pursuant to subsection (1) of this section: (a) The age of the student; (b) The disciplinary history of the student; (c) Whether the student has a disability; (d) The seriousness of the violation committed by the student; (e) Whether the violation committed by the student threatened the safety of any student or staff member; and (f) Whether a lesser intervention would properly address the violation committed by the student." (22-33-106(1.2)) A firearm carries its own federally linked minimum: "a student who is determined to have brought a firearm to a school, or to have possessed a firearm at a school, shall be expelled for a period of not less than one year; except that the superintendent of the student's school district may modify this requirement for a student on a case-by-case basis if such modification is in writing." (22-33-106(1.5))
Suspension and expulsion, preschool through second grade (22-33-106.1). Younger children carry a narrower set of grounds: "an enrolling entity may impose an out-of-school suspension or expel a student enrolled in preschool, kindergarten, first grade, or second grade only if:" the student's conduct "Involves the possession of a dangerous weapon without the authorization of the public school or enrolling entity, if different;" among the other listed conditions. (22-33-106.1(2), (2)(a)(I)) The suspension itself is capped tighter than the general rule: "the out-of-school suspension shall not exceed three school days unless the executive officer or chief administrative officer of the enrolling entity, or designee of either, determines that a longer period of suspension is necessary to resolve the safety threat or recommends that the student be expelled in accordance with section 22-33-105 (2)(c)." (22-33-106.1(3))
Judicial review of an expulsion or denial of admission (22-33-108(2)–(3)). Past the board, the route runs to court, quoted in full in the timelines below and in the published-process row on the record and the appeal route; "No docket or other fees are collected by the court in connection with this proceeding." (22-33-108(2))
No separate State Board of Education regulation on student discipline procedure, and no Colorado Department of Education guidance page on student discipline, was located in this review; the statute is the fullest single statement. The department of education's own hearing-officer training program, created under 22-33-105(2.4)(c), is cited in the statute but was not itself located as a published document in this review; both are recorded in the source map as capture pending.
The published process
- Notice of charges and the hearing right before long-term exclusion
- On suspension, "the suspending authority shall immediately notify the parent, guardian, or legal custodian of the pupil that the pupil has been suspended and of the grounds for the suspension, the period of the suspension, and the time and place for the parent, guardian, or legal custodian to meet with the suspending authority to review the suspension." (22-33-105(3)(a)) The ten-day line dividing an informal hearing from a right to request review is quoted in the docket. Before an expulsion hearing, "the school district seeking to expel or deny admission to the student shall provide all records that the school district intends to use as supporting evidence for expulsion or denial of admission to the student or the student's parent, guardian, or legal custodian at least two business days in which school is in session prior to the expulsion hearing." (22-33-105(2.3)(b)) The burden of proof and the hearing officer's conflict-free requirement are quoted in the docket; the parental-presence requirement for a student's own statement is quoted in the framework above.
- Services during exclusion
- During a suspension, the suspending authority shall "Provide an opportunity for a pupil to make up school work during the period of suspension for full or partial academic credit to the extent possible. The intent of this provision is to provide an opportunity for the pupil to reintegrate into the educational program of the district and to help prevent the pupil from dropping out of school because of an inability to reintegrate into the educational program following the period of suspension." (22-33-105(3)(d)(III)) Continuing education specifically during and after an expulsion is addressed in sections 22-33-203 through 22-33-205, cited elsewhere in article 33 (for example, the reference to "participation in services for at-risk students, as described by section 22-33-204" among a court's contempt sanctions at 22-33-108(7)(b)), but those sections fall outside the pages this review's recipe captures; that capture is pending, and is recorded as such in the source map rather than as an absence in the statute.
- The record made, and the appeal route, forum by forum
- At the district, the executive officer's written opinion within five business days and the ten-business-day appeal to the board are quoted in the docket. Past the board, "Within five business days after a board of education's determination to uphold an expulsion or denial of admission, the board of education shall issue a written order providing notice of the decision." A student or parent who wants court review "must notify the board of education in writing within five business days after receiving official notice of the board of education's action", after which the board "shall issue, or cause to be issued, to the student or the student's parent, guardian, or legal custodian a statement of the reasons for the board of education's action within five business days", and, upon that notice, "the board of education shall provide a complete and accurate copy of the expulsion record to the student or the student's parent, guardian, or legal custodian within five business days." "Within ten business days after receiving the board of education's expulsion record," the student or parent "may file with the court a petition requesting that the order of the board of education be set aside", and "No docket or other fees are collected by the court in connection with this proceeding." (22-33-108(2)) Once filed, "the court shall notify the board of education and shall hold a hearing on the matter within twenty-one calendar days." (22-33-108(3))
- If the student has an IEP or Section 504 plan
- The disability layer lives on this site's Colorado special education page. The grounds section itself states that where a threat is at issue, "if the child who creates the threat is a child with a disability pursuant to section 22-20-103 (5), the child may not be expelled if the actions creating the threat are a manifestation of the child's disability." (22-33-106(1)(c)) Hearing-officer training must itself cover "Requirements and implementation of the applicable portions of the federal "Individuals with Disabilities Education Act", 20 U.S.C. sec. 1400 et seq., as amended; section 504 of the federal "Rehabilitation Act of 1973", 29 U.S.C. sec. 794, as amended; the federal "Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974", 20 U.S.C. sec. 1232g, as amended; the "Exceptional Children's Educational Act", article 20 of this title 22; and the "School Attendance Law of 1963", established pursuant to this article 33." (22-33-105(2.4)(c)(III), (III)(F))
The four rows above answer the questions an experienced adviser raises first, from the state's own statutes, or record that a question is not answered in them.
Timelines, as stated in the sources
All quoted; none calculated. From Colorado Revised Statutes Title 22, Article 33 and section 22-32-109.1 as retrieved Sep 3, 2026.
On suspension by a principal or designee: "not more than five school days on the grounds stated in section 22-33-106 (1)(a), (1)(b), (1)(c), or (1)(e) or not more than ten school days on the grounds stated in section 22-33-106 (1)(d)". (22-33-105(2)(a))
On suspension by the board or its executive officer: "not more than another ten school days," extendable "to an additional ten school days if necessary in order to present the matter to the next meeting of the board of education," with a combined cap: "the total period of suspension pursuant to this paragraph (b) and paragraph (a) of this subsection (2) shall not exceed twenty-five school days". (22-33-105(2)(b))
On the length of an expulsion or denial of admission: "not extending beyond one year". (22-33-105(2)(c))
On records disclosure before an expulsion hearing: "at least two business days in which school is in session prior to the expulsion hearing." (22-33-105(2.3)(b))
On the executive officer's written opinion: "within five business days after an expulsion hearing is conducted". (22-33-105(2.3)(c))
On the appeal to the board: "ten business days after the decision of the executive officer is rendered". (22-33-105(2.3)(d))
On building the hearing-officer training program: "On or before June 30, 2024". (22-33-105(2.4)(c)(I))
On a new hearing officer's initial training: "within thirty days after the date the hearing officer starts work as a hearing officer", beginning "January 1, 2025". (22-33-105(2.4)(c)(II)(A))
On suspension in preschool through second grade: "shall not exceed three school days unless" extended as stated in the framework above. (22-33-106.1(3))
On the board's written order after upholding an expulsion: "Within five business days after a board of education's determination to uphold an expulsion or denial of admission". (22-33-108(2))
On notifying the board to seek court review, the board's statement of reasons, and the copy of the expulsion record: each "within five business days", as quoted in the published process above. (22-33-108(2))
On filing a court petition: "Within ten business days after receiving the board of education's expulsion record". (22-33-108(2))
On the court's hearing: "within twenty-one calendar days" after the petition is filed. (22-33-108(3))
What any of this means for a particular situation is for the district, the agencies, and their processes to determine.
Assigned to district policy by the quoted provision
The statute writes the frame and expressly hands the conduct-code detail to each district's board, mostly through the safe school plan required by 22-32-109.1. Each entry below is a question a district's own documents answer, with the delegating text quoted. No district's conduct and discipline code is captured or quoted here.
The conduct and discipline code itself. Each safe school plan must include "A concisely written conduct and discipline code that must be enforced uniformly, fairly, and consistently for all students. Copies of the code shall be provided to each student upon enrollment at the preschool, elementary, middle, and high school levels and be posted or kept on file at each public school in the school district." (22-32-109.1(2)(a)(I))
General conduct policy. The code must include "General policies on student conduct, safety, and welfare;" (22-32-109.1(2)(a)(I)(A))
Classroom removal by a teacher. The code must set "General policies and procedures for dealing with students who cause a disruption on school grounds, in a school vehicle, or at a school activity or sanctioned event, including a specific policy allowing a teacher to remove a disruptive student from his or her classroom. The policy shall state that, upon the third such removal from a teacher's class, the teacher may remove the disruptive student from the teacher's class for the remainder of the term of the class; except that a disruptive student shall not be removed from a teacher's class for the remainder of the term of the class unless the principal of the student's school or his or her designee has developed and implemented a behavior plan for the student." (22-32-109.1(2)(a)(I)(B))
How suspension and expulsion are imposed. The code must set "General policies and procedures for determining the circumstances under and the manner in which disciplinary actions, including suspension and expulsion, shall be imposed in accordance with the provisions of sections 22-33-105, 22-33-106, and 22-33-106.1;" (22-32-109.1(2)(a)(I)(E))
Physical intervention and corporal punishment. The code must set "Policies and procedures for the use of acts of reasonable and appropriate physical intervention or force in dealing with disruptive students" and "must state that, in accordance with section 22-1-140, a person employed by or volunteering in a public school shall not impose corporal punishment on a child." (22-32-109.1(2)(a)(I)(D))
Weapons, drugs, and controlled substances. The code must include "Written prohibition, consistent with section 22-33-106, of students from bringing or possessing dangerous weapons, drugs, or other controlled substances on school grounds, in a school vehicle, or at a school activity or sanctioned event and from using drugs or other controlled substances on school grounds, in a school vehicle, or at a school activity or sanctioned event;" (22-32-109.1(2)(a)(I)(G))
Searches. The code must include "A written policy concerning searches on school grounds, including searches of student lockers;" (22-32-109.1(2)(a)(I)(I))
Dress code. The code may include "A dress code policy that prohibits students from wearing apparel that is deemed disruptive to the classroom environment or to the maintenance of a safe and orderly school. The dress code policy may require students to wear a school uniform or may establish minimum standards of dress;" (22-32-109.1(2)(a)(I)(J))
Bullying prevention. The code must include "a specific policy concerning bullying prevention and education" and must ensure its policy incorporates "the approaches, policies, and practices outlined in the model bullying prevention and education policy developed pursuant to section 22-2-144." (22-32-109.1(2)(a)(I)(K))
Restraint and seclusion. The code must include "Information concerning the school district's policies for the use of restraint and seclusion on students, including a reference to section 26-20-111 and information concerning the process for filing a complaint regarding the use of restraint or seclusion, as such process is set forth by rule of the state board pursuant to section 22-32-147." (22-32-109.1(2)(a)(I)(L))
Proportionate discipline, since 2013. In creating and enforcing the code, each board "shall: (A) Impose proportionate disciplinary interventions and consequences, including but not limited to in-school suspensions, in response to student misconduct, which interventions and consequences are designed to reduce the number of expulsions, out-of-school suspensions, and referrals to law enforcement, except for such referrals to law enforcement as are required by state or federal law;" (22-32-109.1(2)(a)(II)(A))
Alternative to suspension. The board's policy allowing a parent to attend class with a suspended pupil instead is quoted in the framework above. (22-33-105(4))
Weighing alternatives before expulsion. Each board "shall adopt a policy that states a student must not be expelled or denied admission unless the school district considers whether alternative remedies are appropriate and whether excluding the student from school is necessary to preserve the learning environment." (22-33-105(4.5))
Firearm facsimiles. "Each school district shall develop a policy that shall authorize a student to carry, bring, use, or possess a firearm facsimile on school property for either a school-related or a nonschool- related activity. Such policy shall also consider student violations under this section on a case- by-case basis using the individual facts and circumstances to determine whether suspension, expulsion, or any other disciplinary action, if any, is necessary." (22-33-106(1)(f)) (The packet's own extraction breaks the words nonschool-related and case-by-case across a line at their hyphens, leaving a space the state's own text does not print; quoted here as extracted rather than silently rejoined.)
Records access, as stated in the sources
One expungement is stated outright, tied to a specific and now-historical circumstance: "If a student who is participating in online instruction is suspended or expelled on or after March 23, 2020, in violation of section 22-1-131 (4), the school district or public school that suspends or expels the student shall revoke the suspension or expulsion and expunge the suspension or expulsion from the student's record." (22-33-106(5)) Beyond that one case, a general parental right to inspect, correct, or expunge a child's discipline record is not stated in the sources reviewed (sections 22-33-105 through 22-33-108, 22-33-106.1, 22-33-106.3, 22-33-106.5, and 22-32-109.1 were searched); each district's own conduct and discipline code and safe school plan may address it, and neither is captured here. The statute does address privacy in state-level discipline reporting: the department of education's aggregated data on disciplinary incidents "must be disaggregated by gender, grade level, race, ethnicity, disability, whether the student has federal section 504 accommodations or an individualized education plan, English language learner status, free and reduced-price lunch status, and homeless status, to the maximum extent possible in compliance with the "Colorado Privacy Act", established pursuant to part 13 of article 1 of title 6, the federal "Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974", 20 U.S.C. sec. 1232g, and the "Student Data Transparency and Security Act", created in article 16 of this title 22." (22-32-109.1(2)(b.5)) The department "shall not publicly report individual student data for any purpose". (22-32-109.1(2)(b.5)) That is a rule about state-level reporting, not about a parent's own access to their child's record. Federal records rights under FERPA are not restated here.
Source map
| Document | Location | Dates |
|---|---|---|
| C.R.S. Title 22, Article 33 (22-33-105 – 22-33-108, 22-33-106.1, 22-33-106.3), pages 866–881 of the published title | leg.colorado.gov | head reads "Colorado Revised Statutes 2024"; footers read "Uncertified Printout"; retrieved Sep 3, 2026 |
| C.R.S. 22-32-109.1 (safe school plan; conduct and discipline code), pages 754–766 of the same title | leg.colorado.gov | head reads "Colorado Revised Statutes 2024"; footers read "Uncertified Printout"; retrieved Sep 3, 2026 |
| C.R.S. 22-33-203 – 22-33-205 (educational services during and after expulsion) | cited in article 33 | capture pending; outside the recipe's captured page ranges |
| Colorado Department of Education guidance on student discipline, and the state board's hearing-officer training program under 22-33-105(2.4)(c) | — | not located in this review; capture pending |
| District conduct and discipline codes and safe school plans | each district, per C.R.S. 22-32-109.1(2)(a) | never captured; see the delegation map |
Change log
Sep 3, 2026 · Full-depth build (discipline-layer deepening pass). Re-captured first-party under recipe tools/recipes/colorado-discipline.json (same two sources as the baseline pass, same page ranges): C.R.S. Title 22, Article 33 and section 22-32-109.1. Findings recorded: (1) the framework, hoisted process rows, timelines, district delegation map, and records access section have been built out from the same two statutory sources; the delegation map now carries twelve districted questions from the safe school plan's conduct-and-discipline-code requirements and two more from article 33 itself (the alternative-to-suspension policy and the firearm-facsimile policy); (2) the appeal chain now traces past the board into court: a written order within five business days, a five-business-day notice-and-response cycle for a student or parent seeking court review, a ten-business-day filing window, no docket fees, and a court hearing within twenty-one calendar days (22-33-108(2)–(3)); (3) sections 22-33-203 through 22-33-205, which article 33's own text cites in passing (a truancy-contempt sanction refers to "services for at-risk students, as described by section 22-33-204") and which by title appear to govern continuing education during and after an expulsion, sit outside the two page ranges (866–881 and 754–766) this recipe's sources capture; that gap is recorded in the source map and in the services-during-exclusion row rather than smoothed over, and is a finding for the recipe-backfill pass rather than something this build could reach; (4) one genuine expungement provision was found — the COVID-era online-instruction suspension/expulsion at 22-33-106(5) — but no general parental right to inspect, correct, or expunge a discipline record was found in the sections reviewed; (5) this capture (2026-09-03) reproduces the same statutory text as the 2026-08-30 baseline capture, with one difference worth naming rather than treating as drift: several multi-word phrases that read correctly spaced in the baseline capture (for example, by the school; disciplinary action; habitually disruptive; activity or; safety of) are extracted with the space dropped in this capture (for example, bythe; disciplinaryaction; habituallydisruptive; activityor; safetyof) — the same page, the same recipe, the same digest, a different word-spacing outcome, which this project's own capture history (CLAUDE.md's discussion of the pinned poppler build) identifies as a poppler-build artifact of extraction rather than a change in what the state publishes. This capture's notes record the poppler build as 26.07.0 for the first time; the 2026-08-30 capture predates that field and did not record a build. No quotation on this page was drawn from a location affected by this artifact; where a choice existed between an affected and an unaffected phrasing of the same fact, the unaffected one was quoted (for example, the "habitually disruptive student" definition is quoted from its clean second occurrence at 22-33-106(1)(c.5)(II) rather than its glued first occurrence). This is a finding for whoever next touches capture.py or the poppler pin, not something resolved on this page. Capture pending, as before: educational services during and after expulsion (22-33-203–205), Colorado Department of Education discipline guidance, and the hearing-officer training program itself. Internet Archive captures: to be added. Reviewer: Carrie Schluter. Corrections on the record in this log: hello@fieldassembly.net.
Aug 30, 2026 · Baseline page created (discipline-layer breadth sprint). Captured first-party under recipe tools/recipes/colorado-discipline.json: C.R.S. Title 22 as the Office of Legislative Legal Services publishes it, scoped to the article 33 discipline pages and to the safe-schools section separately. Findings recorded: (1) Colorado is one of the more fully specified states at this layer — the statute itself carries the five-day, ten-day, additional-ten-day, twenty-five-day cumulative, and one-year lines, the informal hearing before removal, the five-business-day written opinion, the two-business-day records disclosure, and the ten-business-day appeal to the board; (2) the ten-day mark divides the process owed, an informal hearing below it and a right to request review above it; (3) the hearing officer must be free of conflict and, since 2024, trained under a program the department of education was directed to create; (4) the conduct and discipline code is the district's, required by 22-32-109.1(2)(a) and required to govern how suspension and expulsion are imposed — a delegation, not an absence, and the entry that will anchor the full page's delegation map; (5) no state office or contact for parents appears in the sources; (6) the state publishes the title under the head "Colorado Revised Statutes 2024" while stamping every page "Uncertified Printout", and the 2025 title was not available at the parallel address on the retrieval date (HTTP 404); both facts are recorded rather than reconciled, and the source is dated as the state dates it. Capture note: the title is published as a single 1,414-page PDF, so each source is scoped to its own page range rather than capturing the whole title, which keeps a later pass comparing the same text. Not yet built, pending the deepening pass: sections 01–02 (framework, hoisted rows, timelines), the district delegation map, and records access. Internet Archive captures: to be added. Reviewer: Carrie Schluter, reviewed 2026-08-30. Corrections on the record in this log: hello@fieldassembly.net.
Oct 6, 2026 · Internet Archive captures recorded. Captures requested on 2026-09-06 by an automated capture pass and recorded this date; no human review is claimed for this entry. No quotation, date, finding or link above was changed by it. Each capture below was requested through Save Page Now and then confirmed to play back. Captures added: CRS Title 22 → https://web.archive.org/web/20260906123845/https://leg.colorado.gov/sites/default/files/images/olls/crs2024-title-22.pdf. Corrections on the record in this log: hello@fieldassembly.net.